charrvein<p>Great read</p><p>"Why RFK Jr.’s pick for a vaccine-autism review may be familiar to Retraction Watch readers"</p><p>"While there’s irony in the retraction of a paper on conflicts of interest for issues with conflicts of interest, the key part of that story is that the journal replaced it with a new version of the paper with an updated conflict of interest statement and changes throughout — and this paper remains intact. "</p><p><a href="https://ecoevo.social/tags/retractionWatch" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>retractionWatch</span></a> <a href="https://ecoevo.social/tags/RFK" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>RFK</span></a> <a href="https://ecoevo.social/tags/vaccine" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>vaccine</span></a> <a href="https://ecoevo.social/tags/antivax" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>antivax</span></a> <a href="https://ecoevo.social/tags/AcademicChatter" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>AcademicChatter</span></a> </p><p><a href="https://retractionwatch.com/2025/03/27/david-geier-retractions-autism-vaccines-rfk-hhs-cdc/" rel="nofollow noopener" translate="no" target="_blank"><span class="invisible">https://</span><span class="ellipsis">retractionwatch.com/2025/03/27</span><span class="invisible">/david-geier-retractions-autism-vaccines-rfk-hhs-cdc/</span></a></p>