lepoulsdumonde.com is one of the many independent Mastodon servers you can use to participate in the fediverse.
Small french Mastodon instance for friends, family and useful bots

Administered by:

Server stats:

52
active users

#scotus

55 posts40 participants4 posts today

Unanimous

#SCOTUS overturned a Chicago politician’s conviction for making statements to bank regulators that were misleading but not false.

The case concerned Patrick Daley Thompson, a former Chicago alderman who is the grandson of one former mayor, Richard J. Daley, and the nephew of another, Richard M. Daley. He conceded that he had misled the regulators but said that did not make his statements criminal”

nytimes.com/2025/03/21/us/poli

Patrick Daley Thompson, a former Chicago alderman, conceded that he had misled regulators but said that did not make his statements criminal.
The New York Times · Supreme Court Rules for Chicago Politician in Bank Fraud CaseBy Adam Liptak
Continued thread

#DOJ Exhibit 1:

“I, C.Salvatore D'Alessio, Jr, Dir, Torts Branch, Civil Division, US DOJ,…hereby certify that I have read the Amended Complaint in this action. On the basis of the information now available w/respect to the claims set forth therein, I find that Donald J. Trump was acting within the scope of federal office or employment at the time of the incidents out of which the plaintiffs' claims arose.”

Bullshit

#law #BlassingameVTrump #SCOTUS #immunity #Trump #Jan6
storage.courtlistener.com/reca

Replied in thread

@heidilifeldman 100%. I agree with you as well.

This ⬇️ :
“It may sound like Roberts was saying that Trump should litigate his disagreements with Judge Boasberg in the normal way, but what he’s really saying is that Trump should feel free to ignore lower court orders until the Supreme Court has a chance to weigh in. By refusing to say anything about Trump’s flagrant disregard for the lower court’s judicial authority, Roberts is literally telling Trump what Trump wants to hear.”

Via Elie Mystal:

"It may sound like #JohnRoberts was saying that #Trump should litigate his disagreements with Judge #Boasberg in the normal way, but what he’s really saying is that Trump should feel free to ignore lower court orders until #SCOTUS has a chance to weigh in. ...

Roberts is trying to maintain the appearance of power in the face of a president who has shown no inclination to respect it"

thenation.com/article/politics

Replied in thread

#DOJ lawyers urged an appeals court Wed to overturn a judge’s block on #Trump’s #deportation of #Venezuelans under the #AlienEnemiesAct.

The filing is the latest volley in an escalating legal battle over Trump's priority of strengthening #immigration enforcement. Trump has called for Chief US District Judge James #Boasberg's #impeachment …[&] #SCOTUS Chief Justice #JohnRoberts rebuked Trump over the impeachment threat.

#law #DueProcess #Judiciary #ConstitutionalCrisis
usatoday.com/story/news/politi

USA TODAY · Trump administration asks appeals court to reverse block on deportation of VenezuelansBy , USA TODAY
Continued thread

Although the article I shared above doesn't mention the agency, through that same February 18th executive order, Downmarket Mussolini also claimed absolute control of another independent regulatory body that is of great concern to all the billionaire nazis that own his regime; specifically the Federal Trade Commission or FTC.

arstechnica.com/tech-policy/20

Trump fires both FTC Democrats in challenge to Supreme Court precedent

"President Trump fired both Democratic members of the Federal Trade Commission yesterday, advancing his administration's claim that the president can fire FTC commissioners despite a US law and a 1935 Supreme Court ruling stating that the president cannot do so without good cause.

Trump fired Democrats Alvaro Bedoya and Rebecca Kelly Slaughter, both of whom said the firings are illegal. Trump "tried to illegally fire me. I'll see the president in court," Bedoya wrote. The FTC was created "to fight fraudsters and monopolists," but Trump "wants the FTC to be a lapdog for his golfing buddies," Bedoya said.

A statement from Slaughter said, "The President illegally fired me from my position as a Federal Trade Commissioner, violating the plain language of a statute and clear Supreme Court precedent." Slaughter said Trump "fears the accountability that opposition voices would provide if the president orders Chairman [Andrew] Ferguson to treat the most powerful corporations and their executives—like those that flanked the President at his inauguration—with kid gloves."

US law says any FTC commissioner "may be removed by the President for inefficiency, neglect of duty, or malfeasance in office." The Supreme Court held in a 1935 case, Humphrey's Executor v. United States, that "Congress intended to restrict the power of removal to one or more of those causes."

The Trump administration claims the case was wrongly decided, but the ruling is still in effect. Trump's Department of Justice said last month that it would urge the Supreme Court to reverse the Humphrey's Executor ruling, saying it "prevents the President from adequately supervising principal officers in the Executive Branch who execute the laws on the President's behalf."

I chose this article because it clearly articulates how long the Trump regime has been working on this, and what their spurious arguments to support it are; but I don't love the hint of both-sidesing here, and that isn't helped by AT changing the original title to no longer center that this is a massive power grab by the executive branch, which is embodied by president Trump. A good example of why I'm not thrilled about the writeup here is printing sub-headers like "FTC Chair: Trump can fire members." The FTC chair is of course some nazi Trump appointed in January, so I'm sure we're all surprised the maggot fascist who owes his job to Trump, thinks Trump can do whatever Trump wants to do, and that is clearly an important detail to highlight in bold, large font text. *Eyeroll*

As such, let me state that based on the current law, and existing SCOTUS precedent, Trump does not have the power to fire two Dem appointed FTC commissioners because he openly admits they'll get in the way of his dogshit plans. The caveat here of course being that we've fully descended into a game of fascist Calvinball, the GOP have a 6-3 majority in the current Supreme Court, and those berobed reactionaries have already shown a willingness to throw out precedent and make up the law as they go, so who the fuck knows if it even matters whether or not he's allowed to fire his political enemies from an independent commission. As it stands now however, what Trump is doing is unquestionably a brazen power grab and also flatly illegal.

Which then brings us to the question of why? Well, consider for a moment what the FTC has been doing recently; this is from an American Prospect article by David Dayen:

"Rebecca Kelly Slaughter and Alvaro Bedoya, both of whom served with former chair Lina Khan in the FTC majority under Joe Biden, were told they were terminated today. The three of them made numerous advances over the past three years on antitrust and consumer protection policies, including successful challenges to numerous mergers and new rules cracking down on subscription deception, restrictive noncompete agreements, and other anti-fraud measures."

Please keep in mind that this is the agency that took Google to court and won. Alright, now consider all the extremely rich tech nazi CEOs who got Der Leader elected and really own the Trump regime; can you think of any reasons why those guys might prefer a corrupt, toothless FTC stacked full of nazis? Perhaps billions of reasons, as in dollars they can make doing shady shit that should be illegal without FTC interference?

In other words, Trump isn't just seizing power for the imperial presidency; he's paying the bills he owes billionaire CEOs by destroying the US regulatory state.

Federal Trade Commission Commissioners Rebecca Kelly Slaughter and Alvaro Bedoya sit at a table and chat with each other at a Congressional hearing.
Ars Technica · Trump fires both FTC Democrats in challenge to Supreme Court precedentBy Jon Brodkin
#USPol#Trump#FTC
Replied in thread

Unbelievable willful ignorance:

#Trump said that #SCOTUS Chief Justice #JohnRoberts’ statement on Tues didn’t mention him by name while doubling down on his call to #impeach a federal judge who ruled against his admin in a high-profile #deportation case.

In an interview on Tues w/ FauxNews’ Laura Ingraham, Trump was asked what his reaction was to Roberts stepping in to make a statement after Trump called for impeaching US District Judge James #Boasberg.

Continued thread

Just hours after #Trump called for the #impeachment of a federal judge who ruled against his #deportation of hundreds of Venezuelans over the weekend, & after Trump's comments targeting Judge #Boasburg spurred a rare public rebuke from #SCOTUS Chief Justice #JohnRoberts, #HouseRepublicans led by Rep #BrandonGill introduced articles of impeachment against Boasberg.

#law #Constitution #JudicialBranch #CoEqualBranchesOfGovernment #ConstitutionalCrisis #AbuseOfPower
axios.com/2025/03/18/donald-tr

Rep. Brandon Gill, wearing a black suit, speaks at a wooden podium while flanked by colleagues in front of a row of flags.
Axios · House GOP moves swiftly to impeach judge targeted by TrumpBy Andrew Solender

7 Corrupted #Judges of the (Ex) #Supreme #Court of the #United #States
(for political and self interest)
have made the #SCOTUS and the #Judicial #Institution irrelevant and impotent.

Scotus legislating that #Trump is above the law put trump above the court itself.

SCOTUS now has no authority, Trump can ignore the SCOTUS
Trump can ignore ALL Judges or sentences or Judicial orders 🤣
trump can ignore ALL laws
there is NO ONE to enforce them anyway.😂

The US judicial sistem is a farce now.

Le président de la Cour suprême des États-Unis prend la parole pour critiquer les menaces de Trump envers les juges fédéraux, menacés de destitution par le président pour s'opposer à lui. "Il existe des procédures d'appel en cas de désaccord", écrit John Roberts, pourtant un juge ultra-conservateur. Ce rappel à l'ordre inédit illustre l'atmosphère néo-fasciste qui règne à Washington. theguardian.com/us-news/live/2

the Guardian · Judge rules against Musk and ‘Doge’, finding USAid shutdown ‘likely violated’ constitution – US politics liveFederal judge orders halt on any work to shut down USAid and tells Musk’s so-called Department for government efficiency to reinstate workers’ email access
Replied to Laffy

@GottaLaff I hope he has seen the absolute tantrum meltdown posted on TS by #POTUS earlier. It’s way past the concept of impeaching anyone in the judiciary. Racism, Slander, Libel, and threats. Maybe, just maybe #SCOTUS is beginning to understand what a monster they have unleashed; and they better get a hold of it PDQ, or the USA will be #Gilead